Lagos Assembly Crisis: DSS threatens lawsuits against two TV stations DSS

0 98

The Department of State Services (DSS) has threatened legal action against Africa Independent Television (AIT) and Channels Television for allegedly broadcasting false and malicious reports about its involvement in the recent crisis at the Lagos State House of Assembly.

The DSS claims the stations misrepresented its actions during a tense period on February 17, 2025, when concerns arose over the possible return of former Speaker Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Obasa.

 

Sarumi

During the crisis, the acting Clerk of the Lagos State House of Assembly invited the DSS to reinforce security amid fears of a potential breakdown of law and order. However, both television stations reported that the DSS had “stormed” or “invaded” the Assembly—a characterization the agency strongly denies.

According to Chief Ayodeji Adedipe, the DSS’s legal representative, the agency’s role was purely to support existing security forces, and it did not engage in any unlawful activities.

Monumental Legacy

In letters dated February 17, 2025, the DSS demanded an immediate retraction of the reports and a public apology to be broadcast across all platforms for three consecutive days. The agency asserted that the reports damaged its reputation by portraying it as reckless and irresponsible.

Biiro D Solution

The DSS warned that failure to comply within seven days would prompt civil and criminal legal actions against the stations under Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act.

The letters stated: “Our client, in fulfilling its statutory mandate of intelligence gathering for good governance and national security, was invited by the acting Clerk of the Lagos State House of Assembly to support security operatives from February 16, 2025. This followed concerns that former Speaker Rt. Hon. Obasa planned to resume office on February 18, 2025, a move perceived as a security threat.”

The DSS criticized the stations for failing to verify the facts before broadcasting the allegation that the agency had invaded the Assembly to prevent members and the Speaker from accessing the chamber.

“This portrayal of our client as a Gestapo-like force supporting one of the feuding parties is false and defamatory,” the DSS stated.

The DSS has demanded: An immediate retraction of the reports. A public apology aired and published on all platforms for three consecutive days.

 

The agency emphasized its commitment to national security and warned that legal consequences would follow if the broadcasters failed to meet its demands

 

Vanguard